Function of a fountain pen
Posted: March 2nd, 2010, 12:19 pm
Topic: Function of a fountain pen
Startbeitrag
Author: Sammy
Hello dear filler friends
I stumbled over this forum a few days ago.
Sifting through I read a few assumptions why pens sometimes don’t write right, or why they leak.
As the production of writing equipment is a part of my job (ball point pens, pencils, pencil extensions, fountain pens, and much more) and as I helped develop ink pen systems, I know that some of the assumptions are wrong.
That’s why I wrote up a short essay on the function system of a fountain pen, a few main problems and their solutions:
For a (good) functioning pen, you need (good) ink. Without it the best fountain pen won’t work. That is why I put ink at the beginning of my essay.
Every ink type, brand, color, has its own properties. These differ in the quality of the used ingredients and in the quality of the production. There are also great differences in the consistency of the ink. Besides that, the coarse ingredients need to be fine and not lumpy. These lumps can congest the ink feed.
The ink feed is the heart piece of a pen, as it bridges the gap between the ink cartridge and the converter or nib. The right amount of ink from the cartridge to the nib is essential. At the same time the right amount of air needs to be let into the cartridge.
The principle of the ink feed is based on the capillary reaction. It sucks the ink out of the cartridge. That is why you can write upside down for a longer time using a fountain pen, than you can using a ball point pen. If the feed lets too much air into the cartridge, the ink is sucked out without resistance and the pen drips.
If the feed lets too little air into the cartridge, the suction of the capillary does not suffice and this leads to interruptions in writing or even to a total stand-still of ink flow. This can be fixed by turning the converter farther in to balance the under-pressure of the cartridge. This is a short term solution that does not fix the core of the problem. Of course it can also be that the air hole of the feed is full of ink and dries, which narrows the flow passage of the air channel. This also leads to writing interruptions.
When the capillary channel gets too narrow, not enough ink can flow through and this again leads to writing interruptions. When it is too large, the suction strength is reduced and this leads to the same effect. There is also a big difference in the material choice for the ink feed. The two most common materials are hard rubber and plastic. The feed made of hard rubber is the first choice, but also the more expensive one. Hard rubber is pressed, so a fine forming such as a capillary channel is not possible. Therefore each must be made separately in a difficult process. (Modern CNC machines do this work today, but still need several minutes per part.) The cheaper solution is the plastic feed, where each part takes mere seconds to make. The exact shaping of the capillary channel is no big problem. Also a larger amount of plastic feeds is produced at once.
The hard rubber feed, on the other hand, has better surface material than the plastic feed. It is much better for the capillary effect. This difference can best be explained by the lotus effect. Here the ink pearls off the surface, and cannot stick. The surface itself is not wetted. This deficiency is often met with a wetter. Herein lays the problem: the wetter is washed off by the ink after a while, and the writing quality weakens.
For the hard rubber feed, no wetter is needed, and a constant writing quality is guaranteed. As long as two factors are obeyed: The constant quality and texture of the ink, as described earlier. And the good position of the nib and no deformation of it.
Another function of the ink feed (not by all) is the collecting of the ink. The more the ink cartridge gets empty, the larger the air bubble in the cartridge gets. This bubble can play a role in the leakage of the pen. The bubble expands in higher temperature or air pressure differences, or may decrease. If it gets warmer or the air pressure sinks (e.g. in an airplane), the bubble expands and ink flows out. This ink is saved in the nib section until it is used up (through writing) or the temperature sinks again resp. the air pressure rises, so the bubble decreases again and sucks the ink back in.
The nib also plays a vital role hereby. It also bases on the capillary function. If the nib is bent, the function of the capillaries is disrupted. Another possibility is that a bent nib no longer lies on the feed and the transmission of ink from the feed to the nib is interrupted. The nib might not lie on the feed from the very beginning.
By the way: the capillary channel of the feed ends at the hole in the nib. The nib, depending on its surface, can have a better or worse wetting, which influences the writing quality.
Another important point is the width of the nib. A fine nib needs a lot less ink than an extra wide nib does. This stands in a not unimportant connection to the amount of ink the capillaries of the feed transport. This again stands in connection to the size of the air channel. The ink consistency should also be kept in mind.
This leads one to the conclusion that only a perfect harmony of the single components results in perfect writing.
Concluding I want to assure you that slight malfunctions of one component do not necessarily result in a complete malfunction of the pen. This only happens when severe malfunctions appear. In my description of possible pen failures I assumed the worst cases possible.
These experiences and results derive from my cooperation in designing ink feeds. I can therefore not guarantee for completeness.
I hope you like what you read.
Many greetings
Sammy
Startbeitrag
Author: Sammy
Hello dear filler friends
I stumbled over this forum a few days ago.
Sifting through I read a few assumptions why pens sometimes don’t write right, or why they leak.
As the production of writing equipment is a part of my job (ball point pens, pencils, pencil extensions, fountain pens, and much more) and as I helped develop ink pen systems, I know that some of the assumptions are wrong.
That’s why I wrote up a short essay on the function system of a fountain pen, a few main problems and their solutions:
For a (good) functioning pen, you need (good) ink. Without it the best fountain pen won’t work. That is why I put ink at the beginning of my essay.
Every ink type, brand, color, has its own properties. These differ in the quality of the used ingredients and in the quality of the production. There are also great differences in the consistency of the ink. Besides that, the coarse ingredients need to be fine and not lumpy. These lumps can congest the ink feed.
The ink feed is the heart piece of a pen, as it bridges the gap between the ink cartridge and the converter or nib. The right amount of ink from the cartridge to the nib is essential. At the same time the right amount of air needs to be let into the cartridge.
The principle of the ink feed is based on the capillary reaction. It sucks the ink out of the cartridge. That is why you can write upside down for a longer time using a fountain pen, than you can using a ball point pen. If the feed lets too much air into the cartridge, the ink is sucked out without resistance and the pen drips.
If the feed lets too little air into the cartridge, the suction of the capillary does not suffice and this leads to interruptions in writing or even to a total stand-still of ink flow. This can be fixed by turning the converter farther in to balance the under-pressure of the cartridge. This is a short term solution that does not fix the core of the problem. Of course it can also be that the air hole of the feed is full of ink and dries, which narrows the flow passage of the air channel. This also leads to writing interruptions.
When the capillary channel gets too narrow, not enough ink can flow through and this again leads to writing interruptions. When it is too large, the suction strength is reduced and this leads to the same effect. There is also a big difference in the material choice for the ink feed. The two most common materials are hard rubber and plastic. The feed made of hard rubber is the first choice, but also the more expensive one. Hard rubber is pressed, so a fine forming such as a capillary channel is not possible. Therefore each must be made separately in a difficult process. (Modern CNC machines do this work today, but still need several minutes per part.) The cheaper solution is the plastic feed, where each part takes mere seconds to make. The exact shaping of the capillary channel is no big problem. Also a larger amount of plastic feeds is produced at once.
The hard rubber feed, on the other hand, has better surface material than the plastic feed. It is much better for the capillary effect. This difference can best be explained by the lotus effect. Here the ink pearls off the surface, and cannot stick. The surface itself is not wetted. This deficiency is often met with a wetter. Herein lays the problem: the wetter is washed off by the ink after a while, and the writing quality weakens.
For the hard rubber feed, no wetter is needed, and a constant writing quality is guaranteed. As long as two factors are obeyed: The constant quality and texture of the ink, as described earlier. And the good position of the nib and no deformation of it.
Another function of the ink feed (not by all) is the collecting of the ink. The more the ink cartridge gets empty, the larger the air bubble in the cartridge gets. This bubble can play a role in the leakage of the pen. The bubble expands in higher temperature or air pressure differences, or may decrease. If it gets warmer or the air pressure sinks (e.g. in an airplane), the bubble expands and ink flows out. This ink is saved in the nib section until it is used up (through writing) or the temperature sinks again resp. the air pressure rises, so the bubble decreases again and sucks the ink back in.
The nib also plays a vital role hereby. It also bases on the capillary function. If the nib is bent, the function of the capillaries is disrupted. Another possibility is that a bent nib no longer lies on the feed and the transmission of ink from the feed to the nib is interrupted. The nib might not lie on the feed from the very beginning.
By the way: the capillary channel of the feed ends at the hole in the nib. The nib, depending on its surface, can have a better or worse wetting, which influences the writing quality.
Another important point is the width of the nib. A fine nib needs a lot less ink than an extra wide nib does. This stands in a not unimportant connection to the amount of ink the capillaries of the feed transport. This again stands in connection to the size of the air channel. The ink consistency should also be kept in mind.
This leads one to the conclusion that only a perfect harmony of the single components results in perfect writing.
Concluding I want to assure you that slight malfunctions of one component do not necessarily result in a complete malfunction of the pen. This only happens when severe malfunctions appear. In my description of possible pen failures I assumed the worst cases possible.
These experiences and results derive from my cooperation in designing ink feeds. I can therefore not guarantee for completeness.
I hope you like what you read.
Many greetings
Sammy